Xeon 6731E vs Itanium 9310
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (15 years ago) | 3 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,121 |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9310 and Xeon 6731E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 10 MB L3 Cache | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9310 and Xeon 6731E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1248 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9310 and Xeon 6731E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 50 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Itanium 9310 and Xeon 6731E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9310 and Xeon 6731E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9310 and Xeon 6731E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9310 and Xeon 6731E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Itanium 9310 has 92.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6731E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and 4700% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Itanium 9310 and Intel Xeon 6731E. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
