i9-13900F vs Itanium 9140N

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.07
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data17.99
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 October 2007 (18 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Itanium 9140N and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threadsno data32
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB L3 Cache36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Itanium 9140N and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA611FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9140N and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Itanium 9140N and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB-+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9140N and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9140N and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9140N and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 4 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900F has an age advantage of 15 years, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Itanium 9140N and Intel Core i9-13900F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Itanium 9140N is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Itanium 9140N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 198 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Itanium 9140N and Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.