EPYC 9355P vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

VS

Primary details

Comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Iris Graphicsno data
Architecture codenameGen9Turin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,998

Detailed specifications

Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threadsno data64
Base clock speedno data3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed0.35 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

EPYC 9355P has a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9355P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 9355P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580
AMD EPYC 9355P
EPYC 9355P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 14 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9355P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Iris Pro Graphics P580 or EPYC 9355P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.