EPYC 7543 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.81
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Iris GraphicsAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data16.74
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameGen9Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateno data12 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,761

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 7543 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threadsno data64
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed0.35 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data28
L1 cacheno data2 MB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 7543 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP3
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 7543. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 7543 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 7543. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 7543.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

EPYC 7543 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD EPYC 7543. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7543 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580
AMD EPYC 7543
EPYC 7543

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7543 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Iris Pro Graphics P580 and EPYC 7543, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.