MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Iris Graphics 48
Primary details
Comparing Iris Graphics 48 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 1944 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Iris Graphics | MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
Architecture codename | Gen9 | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 |
Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Iris Graphics 48 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | no data | 8 |
Boost clock speed | 0.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
Chip lithography | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm | 7 nm |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Iris Graphics 48 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
MediaTek Kompanio 520 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 48 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Graphics 48 and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.