Xeon w5-3525 vs GX-212JJ
Primary details
Comparing GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Prairie Falcon (2016−2018) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | June 2018 (6 years ago) | 24 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,339 |
Detailed specifications
GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 45 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 290 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R1E 1CU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 112 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 290 Watt |
GX-212JJ has 4733.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon w5-3525, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GX-212JJ is a notebook processor while Xeon w5-3525 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between GX-212JJ and Xeon w5-3525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
