Xeon W-10855M vs GX-210JA

VS

Aggregate performance score

GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16
Xeon W-10855M
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.93
+4856%

Xeon W-10855M outperforms GX-210JA by a whopping 4856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3305953
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
SeriesAMDIntel Comet Lake
Power efficiency2.5216.67
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 cacheno data12 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3 BGAFCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GX-210JA 0.16
Xeon W-10855M 7.93
+4856%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

GX-210JA 248
Xeon W-10855M 12594
+4978%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 7.93
Recency 23 May 2013 13 May 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

GX-210JA has 650% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-10855M, on the other hand, has a 4856.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-10855M is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.

Be aware that GX-210JA is a notebook processor while Xeon W-10855M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Xeon W-10855M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA
Intel Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 67 votes

Rate Xeon W-10855M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GX-210JA or Xeon W-10855M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.