Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs FirePro A320
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 outperforms A320 by a whopping 1438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2567 | 391 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 0.52 | 28.51 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) |
| Release date | 7 August 2012 (13 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FirePro A320 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| L1 cache | 192K | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 233 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on FirePro A320 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FirePro A320 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX+, SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FirePro A320 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FirePro A320 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | FirePro | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FirePro A320 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.23 | 18.92 |
| Recency | 7 August 2012 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has a 1438% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 257% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FirePro A320 in performance tests.
Note that FirePro A320 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
