EPYC 9115 vs FirePro A320

VS

Primary details

Comparing FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2253not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.29no data
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Turin (2024)
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$726

Detailed specifications

FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache192K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size246 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million16,630 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardFireProN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 125 Watt

FirePro A320 has 25% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9115, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FirePro A320 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9115 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FirePro A320 and EPYC 9115, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FirePro A320
FirePro A320
AMD EPYC 9115
EPYC 9115

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FirePro A320 or EPYC 9115, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.