Ryzen 5 7520U vs FirePro A300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1277 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 35 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.62 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) |
| Release date | 7 August 2012 (12 years ago) | 20 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FirePro A300 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192K | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on FirePro A300 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FirePro A300 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FirePro A300 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FirePro A300 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | FirePro | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FirePro A300 and Ryzen 5 7520U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2012 | 20 September 2022 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7520U has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FirePro A300 and AMD Ryzen 5 7520U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FirePro A300 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
