Pentium 907 vs FX-9830P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Pentium
Power efficiency2.28no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date31 May 2016 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9830P and Pentium 907 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache320 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per module)512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-9830P and Pentium 907 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P and Pentium 907. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9830P and Pentium 907 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9830P and Pentium 907. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9830P and Pentium 907.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.80 0.33
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

FX-9830P has 445.5% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 907, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-9830P and Intel Pentium 907. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P
Intel Pentium 907
Pentium 907

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 117 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium 907 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-9830P and Pentium 907, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.