i9-10880H vs FX-9830P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9830P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.89
Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
8.13
+330%

Core i9-10880H outperforms FX-9830P by a whopping 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21951082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Comet Lake
Power efficiency2.287.63
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date31 May 2016 (9 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9830P and Core i9-10880H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache320 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per module)2 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-9830P and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP4FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9830P and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9830P and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9830P and Core i9-10880H.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-9830P 1.89
i9-10880H 8.13
+330%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-9830P 3307
Samples: 174
i9-10880H 14240
+331%
Samples: 19

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

FX-9830P 301
i9-10880H 1791
+495%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

FX-9830P 93
i9-10880H 213
+129%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 8.13
Integrated graphics card 1.80 2.85
Recency 31 May 2016 2 April 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

FX-9830P has 28.6% lower power consumption.

i9-10880H, on the other hand, has a 330.2% higher aggregate performance score, 58.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core i9-10880H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-9830P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P
Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 117 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 votes

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-9830P and Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.