Core i5-1335UE vs FX-9830P
Aggregate performance score
i5-1335UE outperforms FX-9830P by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1788 | 893 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-U |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Current price | $749 | no data |
Detailed specifications
FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25-45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-1335UE outperforms FX-9830P by 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-1335UE outperforms FX-9830P by 260% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.14 | 7.71 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
The Core i5-1335UE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9830P and Core i5-1335UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
