Ryzen 5 4680U vs FX-9800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.65
Ryzen 5 4680U
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.38
+408%

Ryzen 5 4680U outperforms FX-9800P by a whopping 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and Ryzen 5 4680U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1987852
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$926 no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Ryzen 5 4680U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache2 MB3 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size250 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Ryzen 5 4680U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Ryzen 5 4680U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Ryzen 5 4680U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Ryzen 5 4680U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9800P 1.65
Ryzen 5 4680U 8.38
+408%

Ryzen 5 4680U outperforms FX-9800P by 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-9800P 2549
Ryzen 5 4680U 12959
+408%

Ryzen 5 4680U outperforms FX-9800P by 408% in Passmark.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-9800P 14.4
Ryzen 5 4680U 8.2
+75.6%

FX-9800P outperforms Ryzen 5 4680U by 76% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX-9800P 3
Ryzen 5 4680U 16
+447%

Ryzen 5 4680U outperforms FX-9800P by 447% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-9800P 236
Ryzen 5 4680U 1291
+447%

Ryzen 5 4680U outperforms FX-9800P by 447% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-9800P 74
Ryzen 5 4680U 170
+130%

Ryzen 5 4680U outperforms FX-9800P by 130% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FX-9800P 0.91
Ryzen 5 4680U 2
+120%

Ryzen 5 4680U outperforms FX-9800P by 120% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 8.38
Integrated graphics card 1.95 7.40
Recency 1 June 2016 13 April 2021
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Ryzen 5 4680U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Ryzen 5 4680U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
Ryzen 5 4680U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 43 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 42 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4680U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9800P or Ryzen 5 4680U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.