Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U vs FX-9800P

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.61
+126%

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U outperforms FX-9800P by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20911497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency10.0922.78
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache320 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per module)512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9800P 1.60
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 3.61
+126%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9800P 2543
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 5742
+126%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 3.61
Integrated graphics card 1.95 3.04
Recency 31 May 2016 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U has a 125.6% higher aggregate performance score, 55.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 44 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 120 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9800P or Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.