FX-6200 vs FX-9800P

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1988	1637
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.51
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	no data
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$926	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	4	6
Base clock speed	2.7 GHz	3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.6 GHz	4.1 GHz
L1 cache	no data	288 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	6144 KB
L3 cache	no data	8192 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Die size	250 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	61 °C
Number of transistors	3100 Million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	no data	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
AES-NI	no data	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

no data

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3, DDR4

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and FX-6200.

PCIe version

no data

n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 outperforms FX-9800P by 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.65	2.65
Recency	1 June 2016	27 February 2012
Physical cores	4	6
Threads	4	6
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---