Ultra 5 236V vs FX-9800P
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 236V outperforms FX-9800P by a whopping 738% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2103 | 557 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | no data |
Power efficiency | 10.16 | 75.10 |
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
L1 cache | 320 KB | 192 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per module) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 3,100 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FP4 | Intel BGA 2833 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz) | Arc 130V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.61 | 13.49 |
Recency | 31 May 2016 | 24 September 2024 |
Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
FX-9800P has 13.3% lower power consumption.
Ultra 5 236V, on the other hand, has a 737.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Core Ultra 5 236V is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Core Ultra 5 236V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.