FX-8320 vs FX-9590

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.42
+87.2%
FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.43

FX-9590 outperforms FX-8320 by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and FX-8320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10621560
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.762.60
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and FX-8320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed4.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4 GHz
L2 cache8192 KB8192 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C61 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 VMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and FX-8320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and FX-8320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and FX-8320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and FX-8320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and FX-8320.

PCIe versionn/an/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.42
+87.2%
FX-8320 3.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
+87.2%
FX-8320 5445

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-9590 534
+16.1%
FX-8320 460

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-9590 2170
+19.8%
FX-8320 1812

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

FX-9590 8670
+34.2%
FX-8320 6460

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.42 3.43
Recency 6 July 2013 23 October 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 125 Watt

FX-9590 has a 87.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

FX-8320, on the other hand, has 76% lower power consumption.

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and FX-8320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
AMD FX-8320
FX-8320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 947 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1424 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or FX-8320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.