Atom N435 vs FX-9590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
5.82
+6367%

FX-9590 outperforms Atom N435 by a whopping 6367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13303713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAtom
Power efficiency1.120.76
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date6 July 2013 (12 years ago)2 June 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of FX-9590 and Atom N435: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and Atom N435 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and Atom N435.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-9590 5.82
+6367%
Atom N435 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
+6563%
Samples: 3437
Atom N435 153
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.82 0.09
Recency 6 July 2013 2 June 2011
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 5 Watt

FX-9590 has a 6367% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N435, on the other hand, has 4300% lower power consumption.

The AMD FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N435 in performance tests.

Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while Atom N435 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1098 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 39 votes

Rate Atom N435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-9590 and Atom N435, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.