Ryzen 9 4900HS vs FX-9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
3.62
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
10.74
+197%

Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms FX-9370 by a whopping 197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1609779
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency0.7012.97
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date6 July 2013 (12 years ago)16 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and Ryzen 9 4900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed4.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and Ryzen 9 4900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP6
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Ryzen 9 4900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Ryzen 9 4900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Ryzen 9 4900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-4266
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Ryzen 9 4900HS.

PCIe versionn/a3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-9370 3.62
Ryzen 9 4900HS 10.74
+197%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-9370 6359
Ryzen 9 4900HS 18869
+197%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-9370 513
Ryzen 9 4900HS 1453
+183%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-9370 2020
Ryzen 9 4900HS 6375
+216%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.62 10.74
Recency 6 July 2013 16 March 2020
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 9 4900HS has a 196.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 528.6% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-9370 in performance tests.

Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 4900HS is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 172 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 169 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-9370 and Ryzen 9 4900HS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.