FX-9800P vs FX-9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
3.95
+141%

FX-9370 outperforms FX-9800P by a whopping 141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9370 and FX-9800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13501977
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date6 July 2013 (10 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$193 $926

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.6 GHz
L2 cache8192 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and FX-9800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and FX-9800P.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9370 3.95
+141%
FX-9800P 1.64

FX-9370 outperforms FX-9800P by 141% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-9370 6167
+141%
FX-9800P 2554

FX-9370 outperforms FX-9800P by 141% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-9370 512
+3.2%
FX-9800P 496

FX-9370 outperforms FX-9800P by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-9370 2043
+84.2%
FX-9800P 1109

FX-9370 outperforms FX-9800P by 84% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.95 1.64
Recency 6 July 2013 1 June 2016
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 15 Watt

The FX-9370 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.

Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while FX-9800P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9370 and FX-9800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 150 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 43 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9370 or FX-9800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.