D-1513N vs FX-9370
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1669 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon D |
| Power efficiency | 1.76 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 6 July 2013 (12 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $192 |
Detailed specifications
FX-9370 and D-1513N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 57 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9370 and D-1513N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and D-1513N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
FX-9370 and D-1513N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and D-1513N are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and D-1513N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.861 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and D-1513N.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 35 Watt |
FX-9370 has 100% more physical cores.
D-1513N, on the other hand, has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 528.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-9370 and Intel D-1513N. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while D-1513N is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
