Ultra 9 295HX vs FX-9370
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1709 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.70 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| Release date | 6 July 2013 (12 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
FX-9370 and Core Ultra 9 295HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 57 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9370 and Core Ultra 9 295HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Core Ultra 9 295HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Core Ultra 9 295HX.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 24 |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ultra 9 295HX has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-9370 and Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 295HX is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
