Athlon Gold 3150G vs FX-9370

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
4.07
Athlon Gold 3150G
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.54
+11.5%

Athlon Gold 3150G outperforms FX-9370 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9370 and Athlon Gold 3150G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14321342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.696.37
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Dali (2020)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and Athlon Gold 3150G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and Athlon Gold 3150G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Athlon Gold 3150G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Athlon Gold 3150G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Athlon Gold 3150G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Athlon Gold 3150G.

PCIe versionn/a4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9370 4.07
Athlon Gold 3150G 4.54
+11.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9370 6230
Athlon Gold 3150G 6944
+11.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.07 4.54
Recency 6 July 2013 21 July 2020
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 65 Watt

FX-9370 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon Gold 3150G, on the other hand, has a 11.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 238.5% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Gold 3150G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9370 and Athlon Gold 3150G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
AMD Athlon Gold 3150G
Athlon Gold 3150G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 159 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9370 or Athlon Gold 3150G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.