Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE vs FX-9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1609not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.69no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date6 July 2013 (12 years ago)May 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM2
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 65 Watt

FX-9370 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE, on the other hand, has 238.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-9370 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 172 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3800 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-9370 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.