Xeon W-3335 vs FX-8800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8800P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.62
Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
22.45
+1286%

Xeon W-3335 outperforms FX-8800P by a whopping 1286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2330309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency4.563.79
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date2 June 2015 (10 years ago)29 July 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes864

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-8800P 1.62
Xeon W-3335 22.45
+1286%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-8800P 2814
Samples: 350
Xeon W-3335 39293
+1296%
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.62 22.45
Recency 2 June 2015 29 July 2021
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

FX-8800P has 1567% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3335, on the other hand, has a 1286% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon W-3335 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-8800P in performance tests.

Be aware that FX-8800P is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3335 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 106 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8800P and Xeon W-3335, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.