EPYC 9255 vs FX-8800P

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8800P and EPYC 9255 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2012not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency11.29no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Turin (2024)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,495

Detailed specifications

FX-8800P and EPYC 9255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size250 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and EPYC 9255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and EPYC 9255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and EPYC 9255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and EPYC 9255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and EPYC 9255 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and EPYC 9255 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and EPYC 9255.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2015 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

FX-8800P has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9255, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8800P and EPYC 9255. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FX-8800P is a notebook processor while EPYC 9255 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8800P and EPYC 9255, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P
AMD EPYC 9255
EPYC 9255

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 102 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8800P or EPYC 9255, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.