A10-9600P vs FX-8800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8800P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.84
+21.9%

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8800P and A10-9600P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19102048
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$515 $494

Detailed specifications

FX-8800P and A10-9600P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.3 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and A10-9600P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and A10-9600P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
AES-NI11
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVXAVXno data
FRTC11
FreeSync11
PowerTune--
DualGraphics11
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAIDno data-
HSA+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and A10-9600P are enumerated here.

AMD-V11
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and A10-9600P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3, DDR4-1866
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count86
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and A10-9600P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and A10-9600P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and A10-9600P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8800P 1.84
+21.9%
A10-9600P 1.51

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8800P 2851
+21.7%
A10-9600P 2343

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 22% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8800P 522
+15.2%
A10-9600P 453

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 15% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8800P 1190
+16.3%
A10-9600P 1023

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 16% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

FX-8800P 2604
+6.4%
A10-9600P 2447

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 6% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-8800P 7860
+20.8%
A10-9600P 6508

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-8800P 4227
+28.6%
A10-9600P 3287

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 29% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-8800P 12.02
+27.3%
A10-9600P 15.3

A10-9600P outperforms FX-8800P by 27% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX-8800P 3
+29.2%
A10-9600P 3

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 29% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-8800P 277
+28.2%
A10-9600P 216

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 28% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-8800P 82
+7.9%
A10-9600P 76

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 8% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FX-8800P 0.96
+6.7%
A10-9600P 0.9

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 7% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-8800P 2.2
+46.7%
A10-9600P 1.5

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 47% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-8800P 1543
+1.1%
A10-9600P 1526

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 1% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-8800P 21
+28.9%
A10-9600P 16

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 29% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-8800P 94
+9.5%
A10-9600P 85

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 9% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

FX-8800P 6349
+17.1%
A10-9600P 5423

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 17% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

FX-8800P 2085
+0.5%
A10-9600P 2074

FX-8800P outperforms A10-9600P by 1% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.84 1.51
Recency 3 June 2015 1 June 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

The FX-8800P is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9600P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8800P and A10-9600P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P
AMD A10-9600P
A10-9600P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 95 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 300 votes

Rate A10-9600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8800P or A10-9600P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.