A10-7400P vs FX-8800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8800P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.61
+33.1%

FX-8800P outperforms A10-7400P by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22922533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency11.50no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date2 June 2015 (10 years ago)4 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8800P and A10-7400P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C102 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and A10-7400P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP4FP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and A10-7400P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.086x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC++
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management++
VirusProtect++
HSA++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and A10-7400P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and A10-7400P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1866
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core count86
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and A10-7400P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and A10-7400P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and A10-7400P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-8800P 1.61
+33.1%
A10-7400P 1.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-8800P 2833
+32.8%
Samples: 345
A10-7400P 2134
Samples: 151

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8800P 531
+64.4%
A10-7400P 323

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8800P 1250
+72.2%
A10-7400P 726

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.61 1.21
Recency 2 June 2015 4 June 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

FX-8800P has a 33.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

A10-7400P, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

The AMD FX-8800P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-7400P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P
AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 105 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8800P and A10-7400P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.