Ryzen 9 7950X vs FX-8370E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.43
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
40.66
+1085%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-8370E by a whopping 1085% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370E and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking146857
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3955.61
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Raphael (Zen 4)
Release date2 September 2014 (9 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$106 $821

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X has 3901% better value for money than FX-8370E.

Detailed specifications

FX-8370E and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million13140 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370E and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370E and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370E and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370E and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370E and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370E 3.43
Ryzen 9 7950X 40.66
+1085%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-8370E by 1085% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8370E 5312
Ryzen 9 7950X 62895
+1084%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-8370E by 1084% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.43 40.66
Recency 2 September 2014 27 September 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 170 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7950X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370E and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370E
FX-8370E
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 83 votes

Rate FX-8370E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1363 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370E or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.