Ryzen 7 2700 vs FX-8370E

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.47
Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.26
+196%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms FX-8370E by a whopping 196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370E and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1567775
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.618.63
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency3.3314.39
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700 has 1315% better value for money than FX-8370E.

Detailed specifications

FX-8370E and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370E and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370E and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370E and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370E and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370E and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370E 3.47
Ryzen 7 2700 10.26
+196%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8370E 5306
Ryzen 7 2700 15701
+196%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.47 10.26
Recency 2 September 2014 19 April 2018
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700 has a 195.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370E and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370E
FX-8370E
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 87 votes

Rate FX-8370E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3074 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370E or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.