Xeon X3440 vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.88
+123%
Xeon X3440
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.74

FX-8370 outperforms Xeon X3440 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and Xeon X3440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14582040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.950.53
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.941.73
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)8 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$215

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8370 has 79% better value for money than Xeon X3440.

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Xeon X3440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed4 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz2.93 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data73 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Xeon X3440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Xeon X3440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

FX-8370 and Xeon X3440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Xeon X3440 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Xeon X3440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Xeon X3440.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370 3.88
+123%
Xeon X3440 1.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8370 6165
+123%
Xeon X3440 2764

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8370 498
+30.4%
Xeon X3440 382

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8370 2009
+67.7%
Xeon X3440 1198

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.88 1.74
Recency 2 September 2014 8 September 2009
Physical cores 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

FX-8370 has a 123% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X3440, on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.

The FX-8370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3440 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while Xeon X3440 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Xeon X3440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
Intel Xeon X3440
Xeon X3440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 381 vote

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 654 votes

Rate Xeon X3440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or Xeon X3440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.