UHD Graphics 630 vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1456not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.95no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Power efficiency2.92no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Gen9.5
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz0.35 GHz
L2 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 630 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while UHD Graphics 630 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and UHD Graphics 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 379 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 95 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or UHD Graphics 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.