Ryzen 7 2700E vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
4.03
Ryzen 7 2700E
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.58
+138%

Ryzen 7 2700E outperforms FX-8370 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and Ryzen 7 2700E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1441824
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.85no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency2.9419.41
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)10 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Ryzen 7 2700E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data28
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Ryzen 7 2700E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 7 2700E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 7 2700E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 7 2700E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 7 2700E.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370 4.03
Ryzen 7 2700E 9.58
+138%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8370 6166
Ryzen 7 2700E 14657
+138%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 9.58
Recency 2 September 2014 10 September 2018
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700E has a 137.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 2700E is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Ryzen 7 2700E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Ryzen 7 2700E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 375 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 34 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or Ryzen 7 2700E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.