Ryzen 5 7545U vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Phoenix (Zen4)
Release date2 September 2014 (9 years ago)2 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$200 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP7
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 2 November 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 28 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7545U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 7545U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
AMD Ryzen 5 7545U
Ryzen 5 7545U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 344 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7545U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or Ryzen 5 7545U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.