EPYC 4584PX vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
4.01
EPYC 4584PX
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
40.65
+914%

EPYC 4584PX outperforms FX-8370 by a whopping 914% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and EPYC 4584PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking135156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Raphael
Release date2 September 2014 (9 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Current price$200 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and EPYC 4584PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and EPYC 4584PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and EPYC 4584PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and EPYC 4584PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and EPYC 4584PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and EPYC 4584PX.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370 4.01
EPYC 4584PX 40.65
+914%

EPYC 4584PX outperforms FX-8370 by 914% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8370 6206
EPYC 4584PX 62877
+913%

EPYC 4584PX outperforms FX-8370 by 913% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.01 40.65
Recency 2 September 2014 21 May 2024
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 120 Watt

The EPYC 4584PX is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4584PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and EPYC 4584PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
AMD EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 344 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4584PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or EPYC 4584PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.