Xeon Silver 4514Y vs FX-8350

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.71
Xeon Silver 4514Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
21.46
+478%

Xeon Silver 4514Y outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1524257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.8972.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency2.8213.62
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4514Y has 8051% better value for money than FX-8350.

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-8350 3.71
Xeon Silver 4514Y 21.46
+478%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8350 5936
Xeon Silver 4514Y 34382
+479%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.71 21.46
Recency 23 October 2012 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 150 Watt

FX-8350 has 20% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4514Y, on the other hand, has a 478.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon Silver 4514Y is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4514Y is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
Intel Xeon Silver 4514Y
Xeon Silver 4514Y

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3848 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4514Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8350 and Xeon Silver 4514Y, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.