Ryzen Threadripper 1940X vs FX-8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1471not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.81no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency2.83no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads828
Base clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Quad-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 29 July 2017
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 8 28
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 180 Watt

FX-8350 has 44% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 75% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3661 vote

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.