Ryzen 7 7435H vs FX-8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.70
Ryzen 7 7435H
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
15.34
+315%

Ryzen 7 7435H outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 315% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1603501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.89no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency2.8432.69
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Rembrandt-H Refresh (Zen 3+)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Ryzen 7 7435H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed4 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Ryzen 7 7435H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen 7 7435H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1USB 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2 , SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen 7 7435H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen 7 7435H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen 7 7435H.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-8350 3.70
Ryzen 7 7435H 15.34
+315%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-8350 5936
Ryzen 7 7435H 24610
+315%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.70 15.34
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 7 7435H has a 314.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7435H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-8350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7435H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
AMD Ryzen 7 7435H
Ryzen 7 7435H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3958 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 105 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7435H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8350 and Ryzen 7 7435H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.