AMD FX-8350 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Comparing FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
128K (per core)
512K (per core)
4 MB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
64 bit support
P0 Vcore voltage
Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V
Information on FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G.
Supported memory types
Maximum memory size
Max memory channels
Maximum memory bandwidth
ECC memory support
General parameters of GPUs integrated into FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G.
Max number of PCIe lanes
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
FX-8350 11.01 +0.5%
Ryzen 5 2400G 10.96
Ryzen 5 2400G 6672 +0.4%
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Ryzen 5 2400G 4805 +50.1%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Ryzen 5 2400G 21024 +24.4%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Ryzen 5 2400G 2 +60.9%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Ryzen 5 2400G 9 +37.7%
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Ryzen 5 2400G 158 +62.9%
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Ryzen 5 2400G 856 +34.6%
Ryzen 5 2400G 7 +20.9%
FX-8350 4562 +18.6%
Ryzen 5 2400G 3846
x264 encoding pass 1
Ryzen 5 2400G 172 +23.7%
x264 encoding pass 2
Ryzen 5 2400G 48 +9.1%
Ryzen 5 2400G 5 +44.4%
FX-8350 8948 +0.4%
Ryzen 5 2400G 8912
Let's see how good FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
0.5% faster in synthetic tests
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Much newer (12 February 2018 vs 23 October 2012)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 32 nm)
Less power hungry (65 vs 125 watts)
AVX2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2 - an extension to AVX, the set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
x86-64 (a general name for 64-bit extension of x86 instruction set. There are AMD64 and Intel 64 versions that differ very little)
So, FX-8350 or Ryzen 5 2400G?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD FX-8350 and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Ryzen 5 2400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.