AMD A10-7700K vs FX-8350

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

FX-8350
3.86
+85.6%

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 86% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing FX-8350 and A10-7700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13431767
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.360.46
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)AMD A-Series (Desktop)
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Godaveri (2014−2018)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years old)14 January 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$152
Current price$143 $87 (0.6x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8350 has 196% better value for money than A10-7700K.

Technical specs

FX-8350 and A10-7700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache8192 KB4096 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and A10-7700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and A10-7700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1SSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VT
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data-
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
HSAno data1

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and A10-7700K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and A10-7700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8350 and A10-7700K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8350 and A10-7700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and A10-7700K.

PCIe versionn/a3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8350 3.86
+85.6%
A10-7700K 2.08

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 86% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8350 5936
+85.7%
A10-7700K 3197

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 86% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

FX-8350 3201
+6.6%
A10-7700K 3004

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-8350 16904
+72.1%
A10-7700K 9821

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 72% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-8350 6648
+47.7%
A10-7700K 4500

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 48% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-8350 8.34
+64.3%
A10-7700K 13.7

A10-7700K outperforms FX-8350 by 64% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX-8350 7
+99.7%
A10-7700K 3

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 100% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-8350 636
+123%
A10-7700K 285

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 123% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-8350 97
+16.9%
A10-7700K 83

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 17% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FX-8350 1.1
+17%
A10-7700K 0.94

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 17% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-8350 3.6
+71.4%
A10-7700K 2.1

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 71% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-8350 4562
+117%
A10-7700K 2098

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 117% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-8350 139
+26.1%
A10-7700K 110

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 26% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-8350 44
+88.3%
A10-7700K 23

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 88% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

FX-8350 11198
+83.4%
A10-7700K 6105

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 83% in Geekbench 2.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

FX-8350 7380
+110%
A10-7700K 3520

FX-8350 outperforms A10-7700K by 110% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.86 2.08
Recency 23 October 2012 14 January 2014
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

The FX-8350 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7700K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and A10-7700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
AMD A10-7700K
A10-7700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3266 votes

Rate AMD FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 132 votes

Rate AMD A10-7700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or A10-7700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.