i486DX4-100 vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1925not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.82no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel 80486
Power efficiency1.26no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)80486 (1989)
Release date2 September 2014 (11 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$147no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of FX-8320E and i486DX4-100: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data33 MT/s
Multiplierno data3
L1 cacheno data16 KB
L2 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm600 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million2 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and i486DX4-100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and i486DX4-100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and i486DX4-100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and i486DX4-100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and i486DX4-100.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 600 nm

FX-8320E has 700% more physical cores, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8320E and Intel i486DX4-100. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8320E is a desktop processor while i486DX4-100 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1274 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 votes

Rate i486DX4-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8320E and i486DX4-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.