Ryzen 5 1600AF vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1524not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.91no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date2 September 2014 (9 years ago)11 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$140 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF.

PCIe versionn/a3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 11 October 2019
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1038 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 227 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Ryzen 5 1600AF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.