GX-217GI vs FX-8320E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1925 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.82 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.26 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Brown Falcon (2016) |
| Release date | 2 September 2014 (11 years ago) | 23 February 2016 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $147 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-8320E and GX-217GI: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 1 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8320E and GX-217GI compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and GX-217GI. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and GX-217GI are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and GX-217GI. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Radeon R6E 4CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and GX-217GI.
| PCIe version | n/a | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 September 2014 | 23 February 2016 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
FX-8320E has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
GX-217GI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 533% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8320E and AMD GX-217GI. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8320E is a desktop processor while GX-217GI is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
