A10-4655M vs FX-8320E

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and A10-4655M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1503	2301
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.91	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	AMD A-Series
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date	2 September 2014 (9 years ago)	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$140	$83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and A10-4655M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	8	4
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	2.8 GHz
L1 cache	no data	192 KB
L2 cache	8192 KB	4 MB (shared)
L3 cache	no data	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	315 mm2	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	100 °C
Number of transistors	1,200 million	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No
P0 Vcore voltage	Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V	no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and A10-4655M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	FP2
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and A10-4655M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and A10-4655M are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and A10-4655M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

unknown Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

AMD Radeon HD 7620G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and A10-4655M.

PCIe version

n/a

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320E outperforms A10-4655M by 200% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	3.21	1.07
Recency	2 September 2014	15 May 2012
Physical cores	8	4
Threads	8	4
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	25 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and A10-4655M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---