Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs FX-8320
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1789 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.06 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 2 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-8320 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8320 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U.
| PCIe version | n/a | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 2 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 28 Watt |
FX-8320 has 33.3% more physical cores.
Ryzen Embedded 8640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 50% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 346.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8320 and AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded 8640U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
