Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs FX-8320
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms FX-8320 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1459 | 1386 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.46 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Zen+ (2018−2020) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (11 years ago) | 8 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Current price | $106 | $718 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 4500 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.
| PCIe version | n/a | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms FX-8320 by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms FX-8320 by 10% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.53 | 3.88 |
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 8 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.
Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
