Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs FX-8320

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.43
+246%
Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.99

FX-8320 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by a whopping 246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15622477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Quad
Power efficiency2.602.08
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$348

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L2 cache8192 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320 3.43
+246%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8320 5441
+245%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 1575

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8320 460
+67.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 274

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8320 1809
+167%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.43 0.99
Recency 23 October 2012 1 January 2009
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

FX-8320 has a 246.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Quad Q9000, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.

The FX-8320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9000 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Core 2 Quad Q9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1425 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Core 2 Quad Q9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.