Core 2 Duo E6400 vs FX-8320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1459not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.44no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)July 2006 (18 years ago)
Current price$106 $52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.13 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache8192 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C61 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million291 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+LGA775,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8320 5456
+613%
Core 2 Duo E6400 765

FX-8320 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6400 by 613% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8320 460
+94.1%
Core 2 Duo E6400 237

FX-8320 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6400 by 94% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8320 1818
+371%
Core 2 Duo E6400 386

FX-8320 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6400 by 371% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Core 2 Duo E6400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Intel Core 2 Duo E6400
Core 2 Duo E6400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1297 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 131 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Core 2 Duo E6400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.