Athlon XP-M 950 vs FX-8320
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1844 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 1.06 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (13 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-8320 and Athlon XP-M 950: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 0.95 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 9.5 |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 256 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 85 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8320 and Athlon XP-M 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 16 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Athlon XP-M 950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Athlon XP-M 950 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Athlon XP-M 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Athlon XP-M 950.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 16 Watt |
FX-8320 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 306% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 950, on the other hand, has 681% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8320 and AMD Athlon XP-M 950. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 950 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
